Heretics and Orthodoxy

by G. K. Chesterton

Paperback: $8.99 Hardcover: $14.99

View Paperback View Hardcover

Heretics and Orthodoxy are two of G. K. Chesterton’s most well-known works. They serve complimentary roles: Heretics attacks the current philosophies while Orthodoxy builds-up an affirmative answer. From Heretics: “I for one have come to believe in going back to fundamentals. Such is the general idea of this book. I wish to deal with my most distinguished contemporaries, not personally or in a merely literary manner, but in relation to the real body of doctrine which they teach... I revert to the doctrinal methods of the thirteenth century, inspired by the general hope of getting something done.” From Orthodoxy: “It is the purpose of the writer to attempt an explanation, not of whether the Christian Faith can be believed, but of how he personally has come to believe it. The book is therefore arranged upon the positive principle of a riddle and its answer. It deals first with all the writer's own solitary and sincere speculations and then with all the startling style in which they were all suddenly satisfied by the Christian Theology. The writer regards it as amounting to a convincing creed. But if it is not that it is at least a repeated and surprising coincidence.”

Book Summary

This text contains two complete books by G.K. Chesterton: Heretics and its sequel, Orthodoxy.

In Heretics, G.K. Chesterton critiques the philosophical landscape of the early 20th century, arguing that modern thinkers ("heretics") err not by being wrong, but by being right in only one narrow area while neglecting the totality of truth. He finds their philosophies to be incomplete, internally contradictory, and ultimately insufficient for a full human life. After being challenged by critics to present his own alternative, he wrote Orthodoxy. This second book is an intellectual autobiography detailing how his own independent attempts to build a coherent worldview led him, to his surprise, to discover that his conclusions were perfectly embodied in traditional Christian doctrine. Together, the books form a two-part argument: Heretics diagnoses the flaws of modern thought, and Orthodoxy presents historical Christianity as the unique and paradoxical answer.

Heretics: A Summary

The Decline of Dogma and the Rise of Modern Heresies

Chesterton begins by arguing that modern society has inverted the meanings of "orthodoxy" and "heresy." Where a heretic was once someone proud of being right against a world gone wrong, it now signifies a fashionable, courageous freethinking. This, he contends, reveals a dangerous apathy towards philosophical truth. Modern thought, obsessed with "practicality," "efficiency," and "art for art's sake," shirks the fundamental question of a complete cosmic philosophy. This refusal to generalize about life's ultimate meaning leads to a race of "small men" in both politics and art. He asserts that the most practical and important thing about a man is his view of the universe, and the rest of the book is his examination of the flawed views held by his distinguished contemporaries.

A Critique of Contemporary Thinkers

Chesterton proceeds to analyze the core philosophies of various influential figures, labeling them "heretics" for their incomplete worldviews. He critiques Rudyard Kipling for a cosmopolitan imperialism that values strength over patriotism and misunderstands the small, local loyalties that truly animate humanity. He examines George Bernard Shaw, arguing that while Shaw is admirably consistent, his worship of the "Superman" and his disdain for common human limitations reveal a lack of appreciation for humanity as it is. Similarly, H.G. Wells's faith in a scientific Utopia and a universe of constant "becoming" is critiqued as a philosophy that denies the fixed, platonic ideals necessary for genuine progress. Chesterton also dissects the aestheticism of Oscar Wilde and others, the manufactured wit of "smart" society novelists, and the supposed "mildness" of the sensationalist Yellow Press, arguing that all these modern trends are weaker, less joyful, and less human than the robust, paradoxical traditions they seek to replace.

Orthodoxy: A Summary

An Intellectual Journey to a Philosophical Riddle

Chesterton frames the book as the story of his personal intellectual journey. He begins with "The Ethics of Elfland," explaining that fairy tales taught him two fundamental truths: first, that the world is a magical, wonderful, and startling place that could have been otherwise; and second, that this wondrous existence comes with mysterious conditions and limitations ("You may live in a palace of gold and sapphire, if you do not say the word ‘cow’"). Upon entering the modern world, he found these two convictions directly contradicted by the prevailing philosophies of scientific fatalism and limitless "progress," which presented the universe as a vast, impersonal, and unchangeable machine. This led him to "The Suicide of Thought," where he saw that modern philosophies like materialism and pure rationalism ultimately destroy the very validity of thought itself, leaving the thinker trapped in a logical circle of despair. This process left him with a central problem: how to find a philosophy that allows one to be at once happily at home in the world and yet astonished by it; how to love the world enough to think it worth changing, while hating its corruption enough to want to change it.

The Paradoxical Key of Christianity

Chesterton recounts his startling discovery that the Christian creed, which he had long dismissed, was the precise and peculiar key that fit the intricate lock of his philosophical riddle. He found that the central paradoxes of Christianity matched the paradoxes he had observed in life. Where paganism offered a stoic, joyless balance, Christianity offered a dynamic and "terrible" equilibrium by holding two opposite passions at their highest tension. For instance, it combined a supreme pride in man (as the image of God) with a supreme humility (as the chief of sinners). It demanded a furious hatred of sin while commanding a furious love for the sinner. The Church’s insistence on the transcendent, personal nature of God explained the world’s goodness without ignoring its evil—the world is a good thing made by a good God, but it has been spoiled by a separate, rebellious power. This view allowed one to be a fanatical optimist about the universe's ultimate design while being a fanatical pessimist about its current state, providing the energy for eternal revolution and reform.

The Romance and Authority of a Living Faith

In his final argument, Chesterton asserts that orthodoxy is not a safe, humdrum affair but the most thrilling and perilous adventure of the mind. It is a "romance" because it sees the world not as a blind machine but as a story with a divine author, full of meaning, purpose, and the potential for miracles. He contrasts this with the "jungle of scepticism," where there can be no plot and thus no adventure. He concludes by explaining why he accepts the Church not as a dead philosophy from which to pick truths, but as a living, truth-telling authority. Like a child trusting his parents' guidance in a garden full of wonders and dangers, he trusts the Church because its doctrines, even the initially unattractive or strange ones (like Original Sin or Hell), have consistently proven to be the very foundations of human dignity, liberty, and joy. For Chesterton, finding orthodoxy was like a yachtsman discovering England and thinking it a new island in the South Seas—he had prided himself on his own lonely exploration, only to find he was the last to arrive at the home of all humanity.